Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 20:55:54 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Klaus_K=C3=BCchemann?= <maciphone2@googlemail.com> To: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any good alternative to Raspberry for Arm64? Message-ID: <8F8F3491-3E1F-45C8-BF61-09F7557F48A5@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <7b284f7718556f1cf0a7a205c98db6b1@pyret.net> References: <7b284f7718556f1cf0a7a205c98db6b1@pyret.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 28.03.2021 um 20:41 schrieb Daniel Engberg = <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net>: >=20 > =E2=80=A6.RockPro64 works well in general=E2=80=A6. Mine was toasted by one-touch static charge, so suspected relatively low = hardware-quality, I would recommend to use 12v/5a(not 3a) and be very careful by touching = that board when power is on. `have otherRK3399 with M.2-slot(Rock960(no more available on the market) = while direct nvme -connection-support by=20 u-boot&FreeBSD is quite complicate , to say it kindly( Rock960 boots = from nvme but hangs @ mountroot> (nvme, nda, nvd seem to have problems) = . By the way, I doubt that RK3399 is faster than RPI4(tested by build = world). powerd doesn=E2=80=99t scale correctly with RK3399 to 1800 for the big = of big.LITTLE , so it=E2=80=99s to set manually=E2=80=A6... Regards K.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8F8F3491-3E1F-45C8-BF61-09F7557F48A5>