Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 11:00:57 -0800 From: "Josh Carroll" <josh.carroll@gmail.com> To: "pete wright" <nomadlogic@gmail.com> Cc: Jerry <jerrymc@msu.edu>, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patches in FreeBSD Message-ID: <8cb6106e0702261100k663a2322wc4dc0c57555821bf@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <57d710000702261058x78723aa3s30605d88082e7ec1@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070226184043.GA59508@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <8cb6106e0702261053k5cf8c64eod62cb2cd498bb87a@mail.gmail.com> <57d710000702261058x78723aa3s30605d88082e7ec1@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> and you can update your third party packages via binary packages > (which you can get from freebsd.org or build yourself)...so it seems > these two solutions would be a great fit. Right, using packages instead of ports means he can do binary updates of packages as well, without having to recompile them from ports for version updates. Josh
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8cb6106e0702261100k663a2322wc4dc0c57555821bf>