Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 17:16:43 +0100 From: "mal content" <artifact.one@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ldconfig "skipping" libraries (6.1-R) Message-ID: <8e96a0b90609080916q1f4d8394w2cdbf18999ad286a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060906192028.GA21278@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0609061902410.16519@pop.ict1.everquick.net> <20060906192028.GA21278@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 06/09/06, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:18:18PM +0000, Edward B. DREGER wrote: > > Greetings all, > > > > > > I'd been going nuts trying to determine why I couldn't link against > > "libdb-4.4.so" and a few other libraries. The ones in question didn't > > show up via > > > > ldconfig -r > > > > although their respective directories _were_ found. (Yes, I even ran > > "ldconfig -R" for good measure.) ldconfig seems to "skip" libraries not > > of the form > > > > m/.+\.so\.[0-9]+/ > > > > i.e., > > > > libfoo.so.1 > > > > is found, but > > > > libbar.so > > libsnuzzlycat.so.5.5 > > > > are not. > > > > Bug or feature? > > Feature. > > > Is this what I get for straying from ports/packages? > > ;-) > > Probably. > Some ports do seem to use this format: $ ls /usr/local/lib | egrep '^lib.*\.so\..*\.' libopenal.so.0.0.8 libportaudio.so.0.0.18 $ ls /usr/X11R6/lib | egrep '^lib.*\.so\..*\.' libqt-mt.so.3.3 libqt-mt.so.3.3.5 libqui.so.1.0 libqui.so.1.0.0 Are you sure this format isn't legal? MC
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8e96a0b90609080916q1f4d8394w2cdbf18999ad286a>