Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2019 11:17:30 +0100 From: Arthur Chance <freebsd@qeng-ho.org> To: mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6-only network--is NAT64+DNS64 really this easy now? Message-ID: <93a8bcd3-df22-7f9b-ef42-2791987eb7c7@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: <20190625071943.vwswhj2lh6ctj4vy@deathbolt.927589452.space> References: <5e24739b-bbd0-d94a-5b0e-53fdeba81245@bluerosetech.com> <CANJ8om6WmNQWibnSCMR2hf09he-wWBUnBmY5Mnn7%2BNtvUHhcBQ@mail.gmail.com> <19784363-6543-ccc1-b13f-5f1a67dc10d1@bluerosetech.com> <20190625071943.vwswhj2lh6ctj4vy@deathbolt.927589452.space>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25/06/2019 08:19, mailinglists-freebsd-questions@927589452.de wrote: > At the troopers con there was an v6 only network and most things already > worked, > The hardest thing is getting a real IPv&/ bigger than a /64 as this is > required by most systems. Really? My ISP (Zen in the UK) gives you a /48 as standard (plus a /64 just for the link to them), and everything I've seen about IPv6 suggests /48 or /56 assignments are the norms. > But i don't understand why you would use a NAT64, as one of the reasons > to use IPv6 is not needing a NAT It's so nice to have servers with the same address in house as well as externally. -- What do we want? A time machine! When do we want it? Errm ...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?93a8bcd3-df22-7f9b-ef42-2791987eb7c7>