Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:34:47 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" <zszalbot@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: www search engines Message-ID: <94136a2c0802070034n1f0b67c8n21392241c4b81ca7@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080207091923.Y22656@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080206004405.M9353@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <47A9B6AB.30505@pixelhammer.com> <20080206152432.W3704@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080207000706.GA19437@aleph.cepheid.org> <EB95F834-7851-4AA0-8393-D8A1771A6254@taconic.net> <20080207091923.Y22656@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2008/2/7, Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>: > >> > >> Then there's the issue of spam and spam blocking. Google does a great > >> job of blocking spam. > even better. > it blocks ligitimate e-mail very efficiently. > > for them - legitimate - means coming from the "wheel of friends" which > means all other "free" huge services. > > everything else may pass, or may not, who knows. > > of course it's not just gmail problem, but all of it's "friends" too, and > - quite often - of smaller mail services. > > > using spamassassin as antispam looks safe (i'm using it quite long), using > automatic IP-based blockers are bad. > spamassassin weights probability of being spam giving point. > when it classifies mail badly by one rule, and well by others it still > does the good job. What does the above have to do with "OT: www search engines" subject and freebsd in general? If you don't like gmail, no one's pushing you to use it. Kind regards, -- Zbigniew Szalbot
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?94136a2c0802070034n1f0b67c8n21392241c4b81ca7>