Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:04:46 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: geom access method and g_topology_lock Message-ID: <94629.1351155886@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <5088FE30.2030903@FreeBSD.org> References: <5088E0E0.2080307@FreeBSD.org> <28185.1351150111@critter.freebsd.dk> <5088FA15.30205@FreeBSD.org> <70960.1351154478@critter.freebsd.dk> <5088FE30.2030903@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <5088FE30.2030903@FreeBSD.org>, Andriy Gapon writes: >on 25/10/2012 11:41 Poul-Henning Kamp said the following: >To clarify, if that's needed, by "geom's access method" I meant the 'access' >member with g_access_t type in struct g_geom. Ahh, sorry, I misinterpreted your question because I though the answer, as posed, would be blindingly obvious. yes, that would not only be bad, that would be VERY BAD. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?94629.1351155886>