Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 05:25:27 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Depreciate and remove gbde Message-ID: <95399.1445318727@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <20151019234855.4ed82051@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <56237623.5010702@fizk.net> <201510182329.t9INTarc018248@fire.js.berklix.net> <20151019061930.461285f8@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <20151019234855.4ed82051@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <20151019234855.4ed82051@gumby.homeunix.com>, RW writes: >I certainly wouldn't like to see gbde removed but I think it is >unfortunate that it's given slightly greater prominence in the handbook >than geli. geli is the right choice for most people. This I fully agree with. GELI is fine if your threatmodel is a stolen laptop. GBDE is for when the user is in danger. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?95399.1445318727>