Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 05:27:16 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: NGie Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Cc: Martin Cracauer <cracauer@cons.org>, Yonas Yanfa <yonas@fizk.net>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Depreciate and remove gbde Message-ID: <95431.1445318836@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <CAGHfRMDdEhgUN_Xbw_KkoF_EpPCRn0E1ZXXvX6Ga2NFRKN1gPg@mail.gmail.com> References: <56237623.5010702@fizk.net> <20151019234406.GA88752@cons.org> <CAGHfRMDdEhgUN_Xbw_KkoF_EpPCRn0E1ZXXvX6Ga2NFRKN1gPg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-------- In message <CAGHfRMDdEhgUN_Xbw_KkoF_EpPCRn0E1ZXXvX6Ga2NFRKN1gPg@mail.gmail= .com>, NGie Cooper writes: >1. Why are there 2 competing technologies? They are not competing, they support two very different threat models. >3. Is there a gain/loss for removing gbde? Yes, you alienate a lot of users who very often are not even in a position to tell you they run FreeBSD. Think human rights activists for instance. >4. Why is it marked experimental [still]? To make people think. -- = Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe = Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence= .
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?95431.1445318836>