Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 May 2017 14:56:09 +0300
From:      Max <maximos@als.nnov.ru>
To:        Babak Farrokhi <farrokhi@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Similar entries in source tracking table
Message-ID:  <96849677-28a6-1c7c-ccbb-2642aacd1813@als.nnov.ru>
In-Reply-To: <C22C7217-CE09-4C3B-89CC-8EA52E892C38@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <5923A420-6BE6-4758-AE37-89C019F179E5@FreeBSD.org> <45a09f51-7b96-f7c1-e53b-9421fd1befbd@als.nnov.ru> <C22C7217-CE09-4C3B-89CC-8EA52E892C38@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Could you set "src.track" to zero and check if the issue persists?


02.05.2017 10:01, Babak Farrokhi пишет:
> Hello,
>
> Here it is:
>
> # pfctl -vvsS
> No ALTQ support in kernel
> ALTQ related functions disabled
> 192.168.232.1 -> 192.168.0.104 ( states 0, connections 0, rate 0.0/0s )
>     age 00:00:53, expires in 00:59:52, 6 pkts, 504 bytes, nat rule 0
> 192.168.232.1 -> 192.168.0.104 ( states 0, connections 0, rate 0.0/0s )
>     age 00:01:21, expires in 00:59:20, 16 pkts, 1344 bytes, nat rule 0
>
> # pfctl -vvss
> No ALTQ support in kernel
> ALTQ related functions disabled
>
> I am running 11-STABLE r317643. Please note that this is only reproducible when you reload your pf configuration and tables.
>
> —
> Babak
>
>
> On 2 May 2017, at 10:41, Max wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Can you show "pfctl -vsS" output? And what version of FreeBSD are you running?
>>
>>
>> 01.05.2017 17:59, Babak Farrokhi пишет:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I was running an experiment with pf in which I encountered an unusual case.
>>>
>>> In a nat setup, is this okay to have multiple similar entries in source tracking table?
>>>
>>> # pfctl -sS
>>> 192.168.232.1 -> 192.168.0.104 ( states 0, connections 0, rate 0.0/0s )
>>> 192.168.232.1 -> 192.168.0.104 ( states 0, connections 0, rate 0.0/0s )
>>> 192.168.232.1 -> 192.168.0.104 ( states 0, connections 0, rate 0.0/0s )
>>>
>>> There are actually three similar binding stuck in source tracking table.
>>> vmstat output also confirms separate memory allocation for three entries in
>>> source tracking table:
>>>
>>> #  vmstat -z | egrep 'ITEM|^pf'
>>> ITEM                   SIZE  LIMIT     USED     FREE      REQ FAIL SLEEP
>>> pf mtags:                48,      0,       0,       0,       0,   0,   0
>>> pf states:              296, 8000005,       0,    1313,    2279,   0,   0
>>> pf state keys:           88,      0,       0,    2655,    4558,   0,   0
>>> pf source nodes:        136, 1500025,       3,     142,       7,   0,   0
>>> pf table entries:       160, 800000,       4,     121,      47,   0,   0
>>> pf table counters:       64,      0,       0,       0,       0,   0,   0
>>> pf frags:               112,      0,       0,       0,       0,   0,   0
>>> pf frag entries:         40, 100000,       0,       0,       0,   0,   0
>>> pf state scrubs:         40,      0,       0,       0,       0,   0,   0
>>>
>>>
>>> I can reproduce this behavior by reloading pf.conf and running traffic through
>>> the box and get a new entry added to source tracking table.
>>>
>>> Here is the nat rule:
>>>
>>> # pfctl -vsn
>>> nat on em0 inet from <internal-net> to any -> <external-net> round-robin sticky-address
>>>     [ Evaluations: 368       Packets: 50        Bytes: 2084        States: 0     ]
>>>     [ Inserted: uid 0 pid 6418 State Creations: 28    ]
>>>
>>> and timers:
>>>
>>> # pfctl -st
>>> tcp.first                    10s
>>> tcp.opening                  10s
>>> tcp.established            4200s
>>> tcp.closing                  10s
>>> tcp.finwait                  15s
>>> tcp.closed                   10s
>>> tcp.tsdiff                   30s
>>> udp.first                    60s
>>> udp.single                   30s
>>> udp.multiple                 60s
>>> icmp.first                   20s
>>> icmp.error                   10s
>>> other.first                  60s
>>> other.single                 30s
>>> other.multiple               60s
>>> frag                         30s
>>> interval                     30s
>>> adaptive.start                0 states
>>> adaptive.end                  0 states
>>> src.track                  3600s
>>>
>>> Any ideas if this behavior is expected?
>>>
>>> —
>>> Babak
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?96849677-28a6-1c7c-ccbb-2642aacd1813>