Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Nov 2015 18:57:03 +0100
From:      Michael Tuexen <tuexen@freebsd.org>
To:        Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Memory management issue on RPi?
Message-ID:  <984BA2E2-DD1A-4D05-858B-362192660E54@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151112171221.GO2257@kib.kiev.ua>
References:  <CB20D8FA-303C-4AA2-B2A6-1FF25DDB8A94@freebsd.org> <20151112121825.GJ2257@kib.kiev.ua> <BE0B4761-54EC-4632-BA23-A3C373D419AE@freebsd.org> <20151112171221.GO2257@kib.kiev.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 12 Nov 2015, at 18:12, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 05:25:37PM +0100, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>>> On 12 Nov 2015, at 13:18, Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>>> This is a known problem with the swap-less OOM.  The following patch
>>> should give you an immediate relief.  You might want to tweak
>>> sysctl vm.pageout_oom_seq if default value is not right, it was =
selected
>>> by 'try and see' approach on very small (32 or 64MB) i386 VM.
>> It just works... Will do some more testing...
>=20
> I am more interested in report if OOM was triggered when it should.
How do I know? What output do you want to see?

Best regards
Michael
>=20
> Try running several instances of 'sort /dev/zero'.
>=20




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?984BA2E2-DD1A-4D05-858B-362192660E54>