Date: Tue, 4 May 99 12:51:05 -0400 From: Kiakas <stefanos@traveler.e-scape.net> To: advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Some thoughts on advocacy (was: Slashdot ftp.cdrom.com upgrade article) Message-ID: <9905041651.AA02474@traveler.e-scape.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPP.3.96.990503140402.27048H-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com> References: <Pine.HPP.3.96.990503140402.27048H-100000@hp9000.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Sun, 2 May 1999, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: > > > uncalled for. Linux users may be persuaded of FreeBSD's > > superiority in some things, but if they are asked to choose on > > the basis of licence, most of them will stick with linux... > > Only because they've been brainwashed with loud "free the code!" battle > cries. > Statements like this are no way to advocate FreeBSD. Calling potential users brainwashed does not gain FreeBSD any friends. Why are some people so arrogant to presume they know what is best for everyone? The only way to make FreeBSD more popular is to prove it provides the best solution for a particular task. The average user, this includes business users, do not care if the software is licensed under GPL or BSD as long as it works. stef To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9905041651.AA02474>