Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Jul 2015 16:43:32 +0200
From:      Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net>
Cc:        "ports@freebsd.org" <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Self committing... allowed or not?
Message-ID:  <9917125A-6342-4F62-B374-E4F456EDC015@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <55AB91ED.3080908@sorbs.net>
References:  <55AB91ED.3080908@sorbs.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Apple-Mail=_A84BCA5B-CAD5-4F5C-8E01-1E862AD9E4D5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

On 19 Jul 2015, at 14:02, Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> wrote:
> 
> please correct me if I'm wrong but isn't self committing (those with the
> commit bit committing their own patches without QA/review/adding
> patchfiles to the PR) against the rules?... or is it just a free-for-all
> now?

If they are the maintainer, it is OK by definition.  Otherwise, approval
from either the maintainer or portmgr@ is needed.

However, a number of people are on vacation, and they have notified
other developers that is OK to fix their ports while they are away.
Within reason, of course. :-)

In any case, which specific ports are you worried about?

-Dimitry


--Apple-Mail=_A84BCA5B-CAD5-4F5C-8E01-1E862AD9E4D5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.27

iEYEARECAAYFAlWrt5sACgkQsF6jCi4glqNWtgCgjvJGooa93myRfnn1LRL+8pUo
lSsAoNi221cvnBpgI3wtCDC1u2aunU7R
=6ii6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_A84BCA5B-CAD5-4F5C-8E01-1E862AD9E4D5--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9917125A-6342-4F62-B374-E4F456EDC015>