Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 21:30:01 +0200 From: Terje Elde <terje@elde.net> To: Frank Leonhardt <freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: VPN where local private address collide Message-ID: <9FB6809B-DD5D-4A04-8BD9-0271FAC03181@elde.net> In-Reply-To: <520E5EC0.5090105@fjl.co.uk> References: <520E5EC0.5090105@fjl.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 16. aug. 2013, at 19:17, Frank Leonhardt <freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk> wrote: > Has anyone actually done this, and if so, how? This is wrong on so many levels, and you'll have to work around all og them.= Yes, you can use nat, but what about adress-resolution? And so on.=20 If it's a specific thing you need to work - a spesific server for example - n= at can work, but if you need general bridging, best to avoid conflicts.=20 Note that there are alternatives, such as L2-bridging rather than L3.=20 If you explain a bit more of the setup, and what you need to work, it'd be e= asier to suggest something.=20 Right now, we know bits of the setup, but not really what problem(s) you're t= rying to solve.=20 Terje
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9FB6809B-DD5D-4A04-8BD9-0271FAC03181>