Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 10:23:43 +0000 From: Andrew Haley <aph-open@littlepinkcloud.com> To: Greg Lewis <glewis@eyesbeyond.com> Cc: Kurt Miller <kurt@intricatesoftware.com>, Mikael Urankar <mikael.urankar@gmail.com>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Call for testing: OpenJDK 11 on Arm64 Message-ID: <9dfcc136-231f-692d-cde4-9c7d17bac3b9@littlepinkcloud.com> In-Reply-To: <0101017e17510bbf-2afcf100-ab72-4117-a02a-b59bf0ad73d6-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> References: <015b381f-d4f6-6088-6474-9add5d9a14c3@littlepinkcloud.com> <0101017e17510bbf-2afcf100-ab72-4117-a02a-b59bf0ad73d6-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/1/22 20:24, Greg Lewis wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > [Adding Mikael and Kurt] > > I'm not subscribed to freebsd-arm, so please include me in any replies > > On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 11:59:02AM +0000, Andrew Haley wrote: >> Is anyone testing OpenJDK on FreeBSD/Arrm64? > > Yes, aarch64 is a fully supported architecture for the BSD java port and > OpenJDK 11 is supported on both FreeBSD/aarch64 and OpenBSD/aarch64. > >> We're about to commit a great big patch for MacOS/AArch64, and it would be >> nice if someone with a FreeBSD/Arm64 system could kick the tyres to make sure >> we didn't break anything. > > Is this based on the MacOS/aarch64 port introduced in OpenJDK 17? If so, > yes the patch will break things but we have an idea of how to resolve > that breakage since we had to do it for OpenJDK 17. OK. It'd be nice to have that committed. >> Please forgive me, but I have no idea of OpenJDK even runs on FreeBSD/Arm64. >> I've never seen it. > > I'm not sure what your interest level is here, I'm the project lead of the AArch64 OpenJDK port. > but the current port is > currently based at at https://github.com/battleblow/jdk11u, although I am > a few weeks behind with merging changes. Interesting. So OpenJDK from the upstream source doesn't build on FreeBSD, you have to patch it? > If you want to see what > architectures are currently supported then the FreeBSD ports tree lists > supported architectures at > > https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/tree/java/openjdk11/Makefile#n14 > >> If anyone is interested, >> >> The PR is https://github.com/openjdk/aarch64-port/pull/14 >> The tree is https://github.com/openjdk/aarch64-port >> >> Checkout this PR locally: >> $ git fetch https://git.openjdk.java.net/aarch64-port pull/14/head:pull/14 >> $ git checkout pull/14 >> >> Update a local copy of the PR: >> $ git checkout pull/14 >> $ git pull https://git.openjdk.java.net/aarch64-port pull/14/head > > Is that against an up to date openjdk11u? If so I can take a look in the > next couple of days. What are you looking for in terms of response? Ideally: I'd like all BSD fixes to be in the 11u source tree, so that everything in there builds on all BSDs. I don't want to approve a patch that breaks BSDs, or any other system. I think it would be better for OpenJDK committers to be able to see BSD changes. And I'd like to say "Hi, thanks!" to BSD maintainers. :-) -- Andrew Haley (he/him) Java Platform Lead Engineer Red Hat UK Ltd. <https://www.redhat.com>; https://keybase.io/andrewhaley EAC8 43EB D3EF DB98 CC77 2FAD A5CD 6035 332F A671
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9dfcc136-231f-692d-cde4-9c7d17bac3b9>