Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 11:54:00 -0700 From: Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net> To: Ronald Klop <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> Cc: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: java/jdk16 missing javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlSeeAlso Message-ID: <AANLkTikmOfh-JLi1Le40y1O9FvucJGipnuz6n_bLJKhH@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <op.vicvv1ti8527sy@212-123-145-58.ip.telfort.nl> References: <AANLkTimMw9K5NVR9i3OB-Whx%2BU0G%2BqjV-NooibX3ms1T@mail.gmail.com> <op.vicvv1ti8527sy@212-123-145-58.ip.telfort.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Ronald Klop <ronald-freebsd8@klop.yi.org> w= rote: > On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:09:49 +0200, Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net> > wrote: > >> With java/jdk16: >> >> Animal.java: >> =A0 =A0import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlSeeAlso; >> >> =A0 =A0@XmlSeeAlso ({Dog.class,Cat.class}) >> =A0 =A0class Animal {} >> =A0 =A0class Dog extends Animal {} >> =A0 =A0class Cat extends Animal {} >> >> javac Animal.java >> >> =A0 =A0Animal.java:1: cannot find symbol >> =A0 =A0symbol =A0: class XmlSeeAlso >> =A0 =A0location: package javax.xml.bind.annotation >> =A0 =A0import javax.xml.bind.annotation.XmlSeeAlso; >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0^ >> =A0 =A0Animal.java:3: cannot find symbol >> =A0 =A0symbol: class XmlSeeAlso >> =A0 =A0@XmlSeeAlso ({Dog.class,Cat.class}) >> =A0 =A0 ^ >> =A0 =A02 errors >> >> This class seems to be missing, yet it is listed in the JDK 6 docs: >> >> >> http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/javax/xml/bind/annotation/X= mlSeeAlso.html >> > > There are differences in the API's between minor versions of java 6. > Especially the XML packages have bitten me more than once. That is why it= is > nice, that java/openjdk6 is up to date. > > Ronald. > My understanding was that there are no minor versions of Java 6 - everything is 1.6.0 patchlevel XX and if the API changed then 1.6.1 would be released (which hasn't happened). Or is this different because we are talking about a javax class rather java? In any case, I'm updating a port and it looks like this class is needed. Is setting JAVA_VENDOR=3D openjdk in the Makefile the best way to force use of openjdk? --=20 Rob Farmer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikmOfh-JLi1Le40y1O9FvucJGipnuz6n_bLJKhH>