Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:35:56 +0100 From: Robert Millan <rmh@debian.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Retrieval of TLS pointer via RDHWR Message-ID: <AANLkTim1eqsA9xzPM9H48-3%2B1DKdDpUxrEE=YQ%2Bv-Vdh@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4D1A1B83.5070602@bsdimp.com> References: <AANLkTimg3CUk0p8YPyepiumEHvKo2F6jdVA0=1CefYrQ@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikxHUj%2BGe3YyJOWMQne31D=uY_712Qveq=Dmh2A@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimyqAWFo5Ddd8_UAL654iGquCMnEjFETUnsFdxO@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=nyXw3Tw-BnhAMwob4yP0-TSxeh5f_wEjtEfQ9@mail.gmail.com> <4D1A1B83.5070602@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2010/12/28 Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>: > On 12/28/2010 04:36, Robert Millan wrote: >> >> Not interested? >> >> Note this might become mandatory if you ever want to compile >> code that uses TLS with recent GCC. >> >> In any case, when executed natively, rdhwr is a speed-up >> compared to a sysarch() call. > > Actually, am interested in this, but have been swamped with other things.= .. > =C2=A0The code looks good, and we should definitely move in this directio= n. Thank you. So can it be committed, or does it need improvement of some kind first? --=20 Robert Millan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTim1eqsA9xzPM9H48-3%2B1DKdDpUxrEE=YQ%2Bv-Vdh>