Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Mar 2011 07:32:29 -0700
From:      Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
To:        Claus Guttesen <kometen@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: zfs, nfs and zil
Message-ID:  <AANLkTimOjxS12fgWnp2QHaJsb5ixKdFXtfvM2i0JdLH6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinZvLDkmUNHmDGQpQFRr31s=hyHuQ@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <BANLkTinZvLDkmUNHmDGQpQFRr31s=hyHuQ@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:22 AM, Claus Guttesen <kometen@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've setup a server with FreeBSD 8.2 (prerelase) and patched zfs to
> ver. 28. The server has 11 disks each 2 TB in raidz2. The performance
> is very good and I've got approx. 117 MB/s on plain GB nics using
> iscsi.
>
> I'm mounting the FreeBSD-server from a couple of vmware esxi 4.1
> servers using nfs, but when there is alot of i/o the server becomes
> unresponsive, easily triggered by installing ie. ms-sql. The server
> itself is up but is not reachable from the network. When I take the
> nic down and up again connection to the network is reestablished
> (ip-wise).
>
> A friend of mine has suggested that I disable the zil. The page
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide says 'Disabling ZIL is not
> recommended where data consistency is required (such as database
> servers) but will not result in file system corruption.'
>
> Has anyone tried to disable zil and achieved better performance and
> still maintain a consistent filesystem?

If your disk controller has a lot of cache on it, and a battery
backup, then enabling the write cache and disabling the ZIL can be
faster, without sacrifising consistency (the write cache on the
controller acts like a ZIL).  There's several threads on the
zfs-discuss mailing list where this is discussed.

However, the better solution, and the one most recommended for those
using NFS with ZFS, is to install a small, write-optimised, SLC-based
SSD to the system as a separate log (SLOG/ZIL) device.

NFS is a very sync-heavy protocol, and having a super-fast ZIL sitting
on a separate SSD will greatly improve things.

-- 
Freddie Cash
fjwcash@gmail.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTimOjxS12fgWnp2QHaJsb5ixKdFXtfvM2i0JdLH6>