Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 May 2010 12:22:28 -0400
From:      Justin Hibbits <jrh29@alumni.cwru.edu>
To:        Andreas Tobler <andreast-list@fgznet.ch>
Cc:        Andreas Tobler <andreastt@gmail.com>, FreeBSD PowerPC ML <freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: RFC/H gdb6 port for powerpc
Message-ID:  <AANLkTinCyPnONZFJXaVA38zS2RNcbkAOzFLw972hZu0l@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AC27BCE.9090502@fgznet.ch>
References:  <4AC2758A.8030708@fgznet.ch> <fd9cd3450909291413u1077919t545a58a415eba9@mail.gmail.com> <4AC27BCE.9090502@fgznet.ch>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Andreas Tobler <andreast-list@fgznet.ch>wrote:

> Hi Justin,
>
>
> Justin Hibbits wrote:
>
>  Thanks for taking on this port, maybe it'll fix the bug I filed against
>> the base gdb.  I'll give it a shot when I get some time to test it.  Have
>> you looked at any of the other BSDs for the necessary missing pieces?
>>
>>
> yes, I did, and it was quite irritating to rely either on obsd or nbsd.
> Obsd has a different ABI here, and nbsd too, we, fbsd lack the altivec regs
> in reg(s).h.
>
> My questions are in terms of signal handling and stack unwinding. How do we
> do that, what are the 'correct' entry points etc.
>
> I have to admit, I solved my thunderbird issue :) I could step into the
> functions, even assembler stuff.
>
> But the confusing part is the testsuite which makes me unsure and the fact
> that we do not store/giving access to altivec regs, Nathan?
>
> Thanks for the response,
> Andreas
>

Andreas,

I just finally (8 months - a new record?) got around to testing gdb6 port
with your patches. (Sorry, forgot about it for a while after other things
took priority)  I don't know if you're still even interested in working on
this, but here's what I've found:  So far most things seem to be working
quite well, the only problem I've found is 'info threads'/thread switching
doesn't work ('info threads' displays nothing, switching throws an error).
 Still, it's far better than the base gdb, since that one wouldn't even run
threaded programs.

- Justin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTinCyPnONZFJXaVA38zS2RNcbkAOzFLw972hZu0l>