Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:05:45 -0800 From: Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Allegations regarding OpenBSD IPSEC Message-ID: <AANLkTind3UU%2BNbJeF6-nKrcZgUV6aEY93cwtWuO1yVFV@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <19720.57471.684530.72355@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> References: <4d08a854.w8rPywliRhHs/MXH%akosela@andykosela.com> <AANLkTin8B44S5Nbz7SOK=muiH2xB4eXv33zzJdxfmPRN@mail.gmail.com> <19720.57471.684530.72355@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 07:36, Garrett Wollman <wollman@bimajority.org> wrote: > <<On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:26:20 -0800, Rob Farmer <rfarmer@predatorlabs.net> said: > >> If his allegations are correct, they should be easy to verify. He >> could post a copy of the NDA and a Freedom of Information Act request >> could be submitted to verify it. If, as claimed, the NDA expired and >> this can be discussed freely by the general public, then they would >> not be able to deny the request. > > Actually, they would, because it would fall under the "internal > personnel matter" exemption from FOIA. > > -GAWollman > I'm not a lawyer, but couldn't he exempt himself and they black out the other people's names? If he could provide some evidence that this isn't a publicity stunt and interest a major media organization or a civil rights group (like the ACLU or EFF), I suspect they could apply enough political and legal pressure to avoid getting brushed off. Besides, if this were legitimate, it could benefit the Democrats (given that it supposedly occurred during the Bush administration), so how hard would they really fight it? -- Rob Farmer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTind3UU%2BNbJeF6-nKrcZgUV6aEY93cwtWuO1yVFV>