Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 13:34:06 +0000 From: =?utf-8?Q?Einar_Bjarni_Halld=C3=B3rsson?= <einar@isnic.is> To: Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple new R ports Message-ID: <AD61A7F4-D5CC-487D-A08A-47267FD69052@isnic.is> In-Reply-To: <CALH631nPt94VcQnsh5_CQHnGkb-5uVvRotFGWWoj4wRtNveXUQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <44F61FC1-532F-447F-80E9-83ED37599CD7@isnic.is> <CALH631nPt94VcQnsh5_CQHnGkb-5uVvRotFGWWoj4wRtNveXUQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On 3 Feb 2024, at 18:56, Gleb Popov <arrowd@freebsd.org> wrote: >=20 > On Sat, Feb 3, 2024 at 6:31=E2=80=AFPM Einar Bjarni Halld=C3=B3rsson = <einar@isnic.is> wrote: >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> I needed to create three new R ports, but with new ports for missing = dependencies, it=E2=80=99s 13 new ports in total, all R packages. >>=20 >> Should I create one PR for them all, or one for each package with = blockers for dependencies? >>=20 >> einar >=20 > Single PR should be fine. You may also consider creating a > Differential revision on our Phabricator. >=20 Thanks. I created a revision in Phabricator for all the ports. We=E2=80=99= ll see how it goes. If needed, I can chop it up into multiple revisions. .einar
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AD61A7F4-D5CC-487D-A08A-47267FD69052>