Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:25:08 -0600 From: Matthew Pherigo <hybrid120@gmail.com> To: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> Cc: freebsd-questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, Chris Stankevitz <chrisstankevitz@gmail.com> Subject: Re: /etc/pf.conf missing Message-ID: <B8682F04-B4FD-4F36-96AA-508895988C23@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44h9uvvwkd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <CAPi0pss6Sd7VWcDSR6JgSnJjOXVuxBLteL12dqM8KD=kpnBsAg@mail.gmail.com> <44h9uvvwkd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, it seems to be incorrect there. Instead, it should probably mention the= directory at /usr/share/examples/pf/, which contains a complete sample pf.c= onf, along with some other rulesets for more fringe use cases. --Matt > On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:12 AM, Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-we= ll.ilk.org> wrote: >=20 > Chris Stankevitz <chrisstankevitz@gmail.com> writes: >=20 >> Q: Should I be alarmed? >>=20 >> Handbook section 30.3.1 says "The default ruleset is already created >> and is named /etc/pf.conf" but that file does not exist on my hard >> drive. >=20 > The Handbook (or at least the obvious interpretation of what it says; > the awkward phrasing may mean that it was mis-edited at some point) is > incorrect.=20 >=20 > I'm not sure that a one-size-fits-all default ruleset (of the sort that > exists for ipfw) is practical for pf. >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?B8682F04-B4FD-4F36-96AA-508895988C23>