Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 11:18:36 +0100 From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> To: Adam K Kirchhoff <akirchhoff135014@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Graphic card that works? Message-ID: <BANLkTi=HoAoEeNx8BBR9EEdDSEXjnSaH4Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201106300523.41240.akirchhoff135014@gmail.com> References: <20110623221305.43b74d53@davenulle.org> <4E0AEA54.1080806@bally-wulff.de> <4E0C016E.1040909@comcast.net> <201106300523.41240.akirchhoff135014@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Adam K Kirchhoff <akirchhoff135014@gmail.com> wrote: > > The OP has already established that nvidia is not an option, and explaine= d why > he feels this way. =C2=A0So why is this still being discussed? =C2=A0Your= happiness with > nvidia is completely irrelevent to this particular discussion. > > Adam > Probably because lots of people happily using the nvidia driver have also tried every other device in the book, and there is a reason why they keep saying nvidia - it works, where as the others really don't. Personally, I'd like to hear more about the OP's issues with his current nvidia card, what it doesn't work on and why, and try to resolve that instead. Less cost, less drama, less 'graphics holy war'. Cheers Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTi=HoAoEeNx8BBR9EEdDSEXjnSaH4Q>