Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 May 2011 11:47:32 -0700
From:      Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
To:        Daan Vreeken <Daan@vehosting.nl>
Cc:        Current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Interrupt storm with MSI in combination with em1
Message-ID:  <BANLkTikuCoUS91qsNcgSy8F8msNCL6d=eQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201105042019.23899.Daan@vehosting.nl>
References:  <201105041734.50738.Daan@vehosting.nl> <BANLkTikejvcKezp56pxYW=t5TLUagHxwRw@mail.gmail.com> <201105042019.23899.Daan@vehosting.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Will you please set it back to a default and then boot and capture the
message for me?

Thank you,

Jack


On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Daan Vreeken <Daan@vehosting.nl> wrote:

> Hi Jack,
>
> Wednesday 04 May 2011 19:46:05 Jack Vogel wrote:
> > Who makes your motherboard? The problem you are having is that MSIX AND
> > MSI are both failing as em0 comes up, so it falls back to Legacy
> interrupt
> > mode,
> > and must be having some issue with sharing the line, causing the storm.
>
> The motherboard is an Asus "P7H55-M".
> Sorry, I should have mentioned that the dmesg output is from booting with :
>
> > >        hw.pci.enable_msix="0"
> > >        hw.pci.enable_msi="0"
>
> .. in "loader.conf".
>
> With those lines in "loader.conf", MSI and MSIX is disabled, both cards
> work
> like they should and there is no interrupt storm.
>
> With MSI/MSIX enabled, both cards work like they should and I see the
> counters
> of the MSI interrupts increase (in small amounts, like they should), but at
> boot-time an interrupt storm starts on 'legacy' IRQ 16.
>
> Because the only difference between disabling/enabling MSI/MSIX seems to be
> in
> the way em0/em1 are used, and because 'em1' shares IRQ 16 according to the
> dmesg, I'm suspecting 'em1' is causing the storm.
> (But please correct me if I'm wrong :)
>
> What can I do to help track this problem down?
>
> > >
> > > According to "dmesg" the following devices share IRQ 16 :
> > >
> > >        pcib1: <ACPI PCI-PCI bridge> irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci0
> > >        em0: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.2.3> port
> > > 0xcc00-0xcc1f mem
> > > 0xf7de0000-0xf7dfffff,0xf7d00000-0xf7d7ffff,0xf7ddc000-0xf7ddffff
> > >           irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1
> > >        vgapci0: <VGA-compatible display> port 0xbc00-0xbc07
> > >           mem 0xf7800000-0xf7bfffff,0xe0000000-0xefffffff irq 16 at
> > > device 2.0 on
> > >           pci0
> > >        ehci0: <Intel PCH USB 2.0 controller USB-B> mem
> > > 0xf7cfa000-0xf7cfa3ff
> > >           irq 16 at device 26.0 on pci0
> > >        em1: <Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection 7.2.3> port
> > > 0xec00-0xec1f mem
> > > 0xf7fe0000-0xf7ffffff,0xf7f00000-0xf7f7ffff,0xf7fdc000-0xf7fdffff
> > >           irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci4
> > >        pcib4: <ACPI PCI-PCI bridge> irq 16 at device 28.5 on pci0
> > >
> > > During a storm "vmstat -i" shows a rate of about 220.000
> interrupts/sec.
> > > MSI
> > > interrupt delivery to both 'em0' and 'em1' seems to work correctly
> during
> > > a storm, as I see their counters increase normally in the "vmstat -i"
> > > output.
> > >
> > > As only 'em0' and 'em1' seem to be using MSI interrupts, my guess is
> that
> > > the
> > > e1000 driver is causing this problem. Could it be that the driver
> forgets
> > > to
> > > clear/mask legacy interrupts when attaching the MSI interrupts perhaps?
> > >
> > > Any tips on how to debug and/or fix this?
> > >
> > >
> > > The full output of "dmesg" can be found here :
> > >        http://vehosting.nl/pub_diffs/dmesg_plantje2_2011_05_04.txt
> > >
> > > And the full output of "pciconf -lv" is here :
> > >        http://vehosting.nl/pub_diffs/pciconf_plantje2_2011_05_04.txt
> > >
>
>
> Regards,
> --
> Daan Vreeken
> VEHosting
> http://VEHosting.nl
> tel: +31-(0)40-7113050 / +31-(0)6-46210825
> KvK nr: 17174380
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTikuCoUS91qsNcgSy8F8msNCL6d=eQ>