Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:24:37 +0300
From:      Petri Helenius <petri@helenius.fi>
To:        krad <kraduk@gmail.com>
Cc:        developer@open-zfs.org, "<freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: l2arc compression leak
Message-ID:  <BBC2F0E8-670C-4835-A8A4-7F8900385C79@helenius.fi>
In-Reply-To: <CALfReyd9oKh-v307Zu_ogAtQ-y200uf__x=cmfL5iHM0cGwE=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <5AD0B5C0-7C72-46FA-86D3-7AFA8FA1E84E@helenius.fi> <CALfReyd9oKh-v307Zu_ogAtQ-y200uf__x=cmfL5iHM0cGwE=Q@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

I wonder when this makes it to HEAD?

Pete

On 17 Jun 2014, at 10:04 , krad <kraduk@gmail.com> wrote:

> thats really a decision for you as your situation is specific to you, =
and you get hit with the penalties if anything goes wrong. If its =
causing you a major problem in production and the risk/benfit ratio is =
worth it you could use it, but I would make sure you do rigorous testing =
first. However if you dont have a specific issue, i would hold off until =
its in stable at least.
>=20
>=20
> On 16 June 2014 07:40, Petri Helenius <petri@helenius.fi> wrote:
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> Recent FreeBSD 10-STABLE seems to be suffering from the L2ARC memory =
leak, eventually hanging on pfault.
>=20
> Should I apply this patch
> http://lists.open-zfs.org/pipermail/developer/2014-March/000535.html
>=20
> or wait for integration to SVN?
>=20
> Pete
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>=20




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BBC2F0E8-670C-4835-A8A4-7F8900385C79>