Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 10:01:26 -0400 From: Carmel <carmel_ny@hotmail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Version of "opencv-core-2.3.1" Message-ID: <BLU0-SMTP176E9578B891A9292981B7493080@phx.gbl> In-Reply-To: <4E75DE55.7080206@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <BLU0-SMTP124381DBDEC52F570FEF1CA93080@phx.gbl> <4E75DE55.7080206@infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011 13:04:37 +0100 Matthew Seaman articulated: > If you wait for a few hours and re-csup it should be fixed. AFAIK, I > don't think this affects portsnap because it generates the INDEX in a > different way. Or you can create your own INDEX if you want. Thanks Mathew for you info. I am using "portsnap" so apparently it does exhibit this behavior. I any case, since it is apparently not a critical problem I will just ignore it for now. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BLU0-SMTP176E9578B891A9292981B7493080>