Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 14:30:09 +0000 From: Carmel NY <carmel_ny@outlook.com> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Conflicts due to renamed KDE4 ports Message-ID: <BN6PR2001MB1730DAE90491E510EDED691F80B20@BN6PR2001MB1730.namprd20.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <a9ce1576-a254-4e79-3e50-b90d49827a1e@freebsd.org> References: <a9ce1576-a254-4e79-3e50-b90d49827a1e@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 14 Apr 2018 14:18:22 +0200, Stefan Esser stated:
{truncated}
>This is another case (after the implementation of FLAVOR support that does
>not seem well-designed and causes lots of effort and inefficiencies in por=
t
>management tools like portmaster), which makes me consider giving up my
>efforts to keep portmaster alive.
Have you tried using "synth"? I have not used it on KDE since I don't have =
KDE
installed; however, it has worked well with other ports that seemed to have=
a
similar problem. It couldn't hurt to give it a try. Just make sure you have=
an
up-to-date ports tree before running it.
--=20
Carmel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BN6PR2001MB1730DAE90491E510EDED691F80B20>