Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 09:24:15 +0200 From: Sverre Svenningsen <ss.alert@online.no> To: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: may I commit this small umodem patch ? Message-ID: <C352D7E1-9ADD-44CB-88E8-4347FC727EE3@online.no> In-Reply-To: <a276da400807041750q7aa04d7va5844d7197230b1a@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080703140719.GA72315@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20080703170700.3b91b8c6@peedub.jennejohn.org> <20080703152551.GA73103@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <200807042333.17859.hselasky@c2i.net> <20080704213959.GA1706@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <a276da400807041750q7aa04d7va5844d7197230b1a@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 5, 2008, at 02:50 , Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 5:39 AM, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> wrote: >>> What about flow control? Is flow control required for these devices? >> >> the ones I am talking about don't implement any form of flow control. >> I suppose they would otherwise match the previous check. >> > > They are many of this device and they do not have flow control. > I got two of them right here. One is for NXP LPC-P2148 and the other > is using Microchip PIC18F USB PICs. > > Last time it was discussed here. > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/2008-April/004907.html > > I've tried the lpcusb based generic CDC-ACM device under > Linux/Windows/NetBSD successfully but not FreeBSD. > > Xiaofan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > > Is current@freebsd.org just an alias to freebsd-current@freebsd.org ? I keep getting duplicates of every message belongin to this discussion... Just thought i'd ask so the next guy replying can remove the dupe address from the CC field :) -Sverre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C352D7E1-9ADD-44CB-88E8-4347FC727EE3>