Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2021 20:37:39 -0400 From: Phil Rosenthal <winterny@gmail.com> To: Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Olivier_Cochard-Labb=C3=A9?= <olivier@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: All transmits on txq0 on an ix interface - why no balancing? Message-ID: <C698F160-267E-412A-8BAA-083331D377C2@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAK7dMtD4jhdN-e=bDcjYV6GK9cz=PWNsdX70KpXdngY7VGp6yg@mail.gmail.com> References: <BB65A467-C11B-4E89-AC9D-815E72D21702@gmail.com> <CA%2Bq%2BTcqkj=r==B-R8s3C1EaGTxV2rKoZxOD_-WnC98-4Pk3zqg@mail.gmail.com> <8923AD0B-1E58-4F7C-AEF5-E9A30D3F9F2C@gmail.com> <CAK7dMtD4jhdN-e=bDcjYV6GK9cz=PWNsdX70KpXdngY7VGp6yg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Apr 13, 2021, at 8:22 PM, Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com> = wrote: >=20 > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 5:11 PM Phil Rosenthal <winterny@gmail.com> = wrote: >>=20 >>> On Apr 13, 2021, at 8:07 PM, Olivier Cochard-Labb=C3=A9 = <olivier@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>=20 >>> Are you exiting through a tunnel interface (GRE, GIF, PPPoE, IPsec, = OpenVPN, etc.) ? >> No. >>=20 >> I am running PF/Altq for NAT and Traffic shaping. >=20 > ALTQ is the problem in this situation. Try without it and see if you > get proper distribution. Yep, proper distribution with altq disabled. That's pretty unfortunate, though ... It means that I'm forced to deal = with the Comcast's buffer management which allows for more buffer bloat = and is less deterministic about what packets get dropped. I'm assuming that this won't get fixed due to PF generally not being = maintained these days -- is there any other solution for shaping with = active queue management (preferably RED) on FreeBSD to use instead of = altq? Dummynet obviously has problems of it's own. In any event - thanks for your help. -Phil=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C698F160-267E-412A-8BAA-083331D377C2>