Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 09:31:20 +0200 From: Vincenzo Maffione <v.maffione@gmail.com> To: Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de> Cc: FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [panic] netmap(4) and if_lagg(4) Message-ID: <CA%2B_eA9j%2BN5-2om2DETe0K1sAUPqDgwuNuNbF2F9St6C-YCKWQg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5927D77A.60502@omnilan.de> References: <58CBCD7A.8060301@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9iCT7evWUcZMA_ViKfrZnSHp3OpBTS5c4iJ9=ZjO-Pfgw@mail.gmail.com> <58CC23F5.7060507@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9iajZOUFsnWKdodN7zMvst8wn0xViM4xxEx%2B41jw_0B3g@mail.gmail.com> <58CFA394.8070901@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9jf_VjcYUZynu5CXx-ps5z7PSxOky=QLpR-miqtxmMU5w@mail.gmail.com> <5926EE96.1010000@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9gcMD1QyG35p5UY8kz6n1kF%2B56Arz3q1T8HVBfMv3XN0w@mail.gmail.com> <5926F9F9.4040706@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9hripEStmfJhj_Q93OF5jFf2nfQXeuA2DnuSjBmJi6j4g@mail.gmail.com> <592701D6.7030301@omnilan.de> <592742A8.4010207@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9jg-xXJpeyQkcFzA%2B-y=qbwROww2FRWzCN=dkmfkaQivQ@mail.gmail.com> <5927D560.10003@omnilan.de> <CA%2B_eA9jhDZ-Cnj8zyAcp=1dw=Q%2BZm2m%2BBkxK11x6Y%2BHLhX%2BrUg@mail.gmail.com> <5927D77A.60502@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is lagg0 the only interface attached to vale0?
Is lagg0 aggregating a VLAN interface?
You can try this trivial patch
diff --git a/sys/dev/netmap/netmap_generic.c
b/sys/dev/netmap/netmap_generic.c
index f148b228..46a3c2c6 100644
--- a/sys/dev/netmap/netmap_generic.c
+++ b/sys/dev/netmap/netmap_generic.c
@@ -950,6 +950,10 @@ generic_rx_handler(struct ifnet *ifp, struct mbuf *m)
u_int work_done;
u_int r =3D MBUF_RXQ(m); /* receive ring number */
+ if (!NM_NA_VALID(ifp)) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+
if (r >=3D na->num_rx_rings) {
r =3D r % na->num_rx_rings;
}
2017-05-26 9:21 GMT+02:00 Harry Schmalzbauer <freebsd@omnilan.de>:
> Bez=C3=BCglich Vincenzo Maffione's Nachricht vom 26.05.2017 09:14 (localt=
ime):
> > Hi,
> > Your stack trace report this:
> >
> > #7 0xffffffff8069dc50 at vlan_input+0x1f0
> >
> > which means VLANs are involved, in some way. Is that the correct trace?
>
> The trace is from the pnaic after doing 'vale-ctl -a vale0:lagg0' (while
> lagg0 can have various names, but I'm not using a vlan clone).
>
> Might be that existing, but to my understanding uninvolved vlan clones
> interfere here...
> The lagg0 does have vlan clones (lots of) defined.
> Unfortunately I can't take them out of the game for testing...
>
> Does that picture match the trace?
>
> thanks,
>
> -harry
>
>
>
--=20
Vincenzo Maffione
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2B_eA9j%2BN5-2om2DETe0K1sAUPqDgwuNuNbF2F9St6C-YCKWQg>