Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:22:18 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Erich Weiler <weiler@soe.ucsc.edu> Subject: Re: pf performance? Message-ID: <CA%2Bq%2BTcru%2BYRc5JAumHBtWUu8C-WOFiAC3AckMmYthmZK9mT=MQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130426134224.GV76816@FreeBSD.org> References: <5176E5C1.9090601@soe.ucsc.edu> <20130426134224.GV76816@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> In FreeBSD 10 pf is no longer under single lock. On your hardware,
> I'd expect a measurable performance gain if you migrate to 10.
Compairing 9.1 and current (249908) on my new test-server (HP ProLiant
DL320 G5, dual-core Xeon 3050, dual Intel NIC).
Like usual: one unidirectional flow of small packets, values in
packet-per-seconds:
x 9.1
+ current
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 5 379991 381508 381229 380892.6 667.69926
+ 5 332833 335502 334726 334223.2 1142.8266
Difference at 95.0% confidence
-46669.4 +/- 1364.98
-12.2526% +/- 0.358363%
(Student's t, pooled s = 935.915)
Regards,
Olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2Bq%2BTcru%2BYRc5JAumHBtWUu8C-WOFiAC3AckMmYthmZK9mT=MQ>