Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2014 08:34:17 +0900 From: "Lundberg, Johannes" <johannes@brilliantservice.co.jp> To: FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: snapshot iso, memstick.img missing? Message-ID: <CAASDrV=KfLdT5%2BHcYL5sO4SUf0xC88GGv=zZXz5dJscZ_5=gvA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
SGkNCg0KSSBjYW4ndCBzZWVtIHRvIGZpbmQNCkZyZWVCU0QtMTEuMC1DVVJSRU5ULWFtZDY0LTIw MTQxMDI1LXIyNzM2MzUtbWVtc3RpY2suaW1nDQoNCkFueSByZWFzb24gd2h5IHRoaXMgaXMgbWlz c2luZz8NCg0KLS0NCkpvaGFubmVzIEx1bmRiZXJnDQoKLS0gCj0tPS09LT0tPS09LT0tPS09LT0t PS09LT0tPS09LT0tPS09LT0tPS09LT0tPS09LT0tPS09LQrnp5jlr4bkv53mjIHjgavjgaTjgYTj gabvvJrjgZPjga7pm7vlrZDjg6Hjg7zjg6vjga/jgIHlkI3lrpvkurrjgavpgIHkv6HjgZfjgZ/j goLjga7jgafjgYLjgorjgIHnp5jljL/nibnmqKnjga7lr77osaHjgajjgarjgovmg4XloLHjgpLl kKvjgpPjgafjgYTjgb7jgZnjgIIK44KC44GX44CB5ZCN5a6b5Lq65Lul5aSW44Gu5pa544GM5Y+X 5L+h44GV44KM44Gf5aC05ZCI44CB44GT44Gu44Oh44O844Or44Gu56C05qOE44CB44GK44KI44Gz 44GT44Gu44Oh44O844Or44Gr6Zai44GZ44KL5LiA5YiH44Gu6ZaL56S644CBCuikh+WGmeOAgemF jeW4g+OAgeOBneOBruS7luOBruWIqeeUqOOAgeOBvuOBn+OBr+iomOi8ieWGheWuueOBq+WfuuOB peOBj+OBhOOBi+OBquOCi+ihjOWLleOCguOBleOCjOOBquOBhOOCiOOBhuOBiumhmOOBhOeUs+OB l+S4iuOBkuOBvuOBmeOAggotLS0KQ09ORklERU5USUFMSVRZIE5PVEU6IFRoZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlv biBpbiB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGlzIGNvbmZpZGVudGlhbAphbmQgaW50ZW5kZWQgc29sZWx5IGZvciB0 aGUgYWRkcmVzc2VlLgpEaXNjbG9zdXJlLCBjb3B5aW5nLCBkaXN0cmlidXRpb24gb3IgYW55IG90 aGVyIGFjdGlvbiBvZiB1c2Ugb2YgdGhpcwplbWFpbCBieSBwZXJzb24gb3RoZXIgdGhhbiBpbnRl bmRlZCByZWNpcGllbnQsIGlzIHByb2hpYml0ZWQuCklmIHlvdSBhcmUgbm90IHRoZSBpbnRlbmRl ZCByZWNpcGllbnQgYW5kIGhhdmUgcmVjZWl2ZWQgdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBpbgplcnJvciwgcGxlYXNl IGRlc3Ryb3kgdGhlIG9yaWdpbmFsIG1lc3NhZ2UuCg== From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 8 00:23:17 2014 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1050E509; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 00:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:d1:b4d6:e600:4261:86ff:fef6:aa2a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D92BD18C; Sat, 8 Nov 2014 00:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sA80NKf6084639; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:23:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: "FreeBSD ports" <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>, "FreeBSD CURRENT" <current@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> From: "Chris H" <bsd-lists@bsdforge.com> Subject: How exactly does the base toolchain determine WHICH language to build with? Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 16:23:20 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <6810431a15d054459a29d434dd22619e@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current <freebsd-current.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2014 00:23:17 -0000 Greetings, Sorry for the long title. I've been [needlessly] struggling with getting ports within the ports tree to build, on a fresh 11-CURRENT install from 2014-11-05. With custom KERNEL and WORLD built, and installed. Here's my situation, which has worked well since ~8.2; make.conf(5) WITHOUT_CLANG=true FAVORITE_COMPILER=gcc src.conf(5) WITHOUT_CLANG=true I'll neither argue, nor defend rational for w/o clang. To boring and out of scope for this thread. That said; I realize that lang/clang(33/34/35) is the default toolchain for 10+, and that's just fine by me. So I shouldn't be terribly surprised when install kernel/world, followed by make delete-old removes the clang built, or provided by the base install from the (initial) install procedure. But what _does_ surprise me, is that the install of lang/gcc-48 does _not_ become the compiler of choice with the above $ENV, after [seemingly] deleting clang. I understand that it may not be advisable to eliminate the default [base] toolchain. But leaving only remnants of clang, causes quite a bit of what I would consider POLA. Given that clang's bin files are [still] located in /usr/bin, while additional compilers are located in /usr/local/bin. All past installs -- even an older 11, did not exhibit this problem. What's changed? What's the rational, and how to best setup an effective build $ENV under the current circumstances? Or is this simply an [unintended] anomaly? Currently, the only way I can envision overcoming this, is by way of make.conf(5). Using the CC, CXX, and CPP directives. Which IMHO is not ideal. Thank you for all your time, and consideration, and sorry for the somewhat longish post. --Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAASDrV=KfLdT5%2BHcYL5sO4SUf0xC88GGv=zZXz5dJscZ_5=gvA>