Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:48:28 +0430 From: s m <sam.gh1986@gmail.com> To: Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> Cc: Olivier Nicole <on@cs.ait.ac.th>, FreeBSD Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Olivier Nicole <olivier.nicole@cs.ait.ac.th>, sthaug@nethelp.no Subject: Re: how define network with mask 8 for dhcp server? Message-ID: <CAA_1SgF09WTmUbQbUPf-sxTd6iAySp%2BRr8a9bEB8rYG318bMGA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPS9%2BStCqGx20rUWyUkQOUX44po6speAoD0tPmc3YtWNvbxa3Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAA_1SgHWSwm62xsXzas7W0SOtDoLL-0o85%2BdqGeLzDbhb=KWQg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2Bg%2BBvhvo0Tx0XjyGw7fTV=aribbev1BEh8cUsVLWjxD2d62pg@mail.gmail.com> <CAA_1SgGJdt8h3-5naE32PuuWxX26NhiXietyOsh20Lf73pkrVQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130812.071303.74723582.sthaug@nethelp.no> <CAPS9%2BStfwq309h641hiTGnav=bTWdr5HWdz4evpMqTx6mfx%2BgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAA_1SgGck7Tne56p2yWS261rc6trR1QiDJ1kk-BbcfbDk5yRCQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAPS9%2BStCqGx20rUWyUkQOUX44po6speAoD0tPmc3YtWNvbxa3Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
yup, absolutely right:) is there any way to improve performance??? do you have any suggestion? On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, thats another problem :) At least dhcpd doesn't crash and could > deliver the full range of a /8 network. > > Best regards > Andreas > > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 11:00 AM, s m <sam.gh1986@gmail.com> wrote: > >> thanks Andreas, but it can not help me. it uses all my RAM memory yet:( >> >> >> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 7:13 AM, <sthaug@nethelp.no> wrote: >>> >>>> > you're right Olivier, but you know i have a user interface for dhcp >>>> and i >>>> > should handle all the network and ranges which are inserted by user >>>> and >>>> > logically are true. network with mask 8, logically is true and having >>>> > million available ip address, too. >>>> > i just wanna know if there is any solution to improve my performance >>>> or not. >>>> >>>> There is no solution with ISC DHCP. I doubt you'll find other suitable >>>> alternatives, but you're free to try of course. >>>> >>>> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no >>>> >>>> >>> One thing to try is to have more range statements in the block, like: >>> >>> subnet 192.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 >>> { >>> range 192.0.0.1 192.127.255.255; >>> range 192.128.0.0 192.255.255.255; >>> } >>> >>> Best regards >>> Andreas >>> >> >> >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAA_1SgF09WTmUbQbUPf-sxTd6iAySp%2BRr8a9bEB8rYG318bMGA>