Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 20:22:43 +0200 From: Luca Pizzamiglio <luca.pizzamiglio@gmail.com> To: Joseph Mingrone <jrm@freebsd.org> Cc: Steve Wills <steve@mouf.net>, ports@freebsd.org, sunpoet@freebsd.org, swills@freebsd.org, adamw@freebsd.org, bradleythughes@fastmail.fm Subject: Re: situation with www/node6 and www/node Message-ID: <CAB88xy_CCJD0-QOY2P10PJzv1idv0JWkMFbSGC7kXvV60hyC=A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <86bmqqcb4k.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> References: <86fug2cc5o.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca> <1cabf0dd-bf6f-d172-479b-cd5c0e9e707e@mouf.net> <86bmqqcb4k.fsf@phe.ftfl.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, node6 is the LTS, node is the current. From a stability point of view, node6 is the choice, but node (7) is already widely used. Probably, the best solution would be to provide the desired node version via Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk and then all ports depends to the common version (like perl, python, ...). In the meanwhile, node can be the new default for yarn and the conflict will be solved (and it will be coherent with npm)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAB88xy_CCJD0-QOY2P10PJzv1idv0JWkMFbSGC7kXvV60hyC=A>