Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 13:32:55 +0200 From: Domagoj Stolfa <domagoj.stolfa@gmail.com> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: The OpenBSD pledge Message-ID: <CABRKQr5XO=aJ60foH=kZ0MD8Ro0q6b=6n=pCYOAdAB1YsSs-%2BA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CABRKQr7WheAHMRC04v90Rz68SFVBwapOn97bTiuPBy5x1ZaT=g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CABRKQr4U6-QKjcxWK_zV9TYBq-FFzuo4QxyRZ5Dcf9KxLjrypQ@mail.gmail.com> <20160611103834.GA75085@lyxys.ka.sub.org> <1F5A9247-7C98-483C-A4BD-4A3D54208B3D@alumni.tu-berlin.de> <CABRKQr7WheAHMRC04v90Rz68SFVBwapOn97bTiuPBy5x1ZaT=g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, it would maybe make sense to do so. I am not too familiar with capsicum(4), but glancing over it, it might be possible. If anything, it would allow for code reuse from the OpenBSD ports and increased portability in the future. Maybe the people who have worked with capsicum(4) or have developed it could give some more insight on this. Domagoj
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABRKQr5XO=aJ60foH=kZ0MD8Ro0q6b=6n=pCYOAdAB1YsSs-%2BA>