Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 12:37:26 +0200 From: Olivier Smedts <olivier@gid0.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkgng 1.0 release schedule, and HEAD switch to pkgng by default schedule Message-ID: <CABzXLYM4RSkhOHRquG-5werAQVyGzJ2PWPL%2BK7m7dAEnCSvM2w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120820232147.GD23607@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20120820194313.GC23607@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <CAL409KxPwGaCS-BL_tW7P1cX_Jk1V_h8wBdTUjbCWxU8fA_WtQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120820232147.GD23607@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2012/8/21 Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>: > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:09:46AM +0300, Vitaly Magerya wrote: >> What would be the best practice of mixing ports with packages? > > There is no best practice for that unfortunatly, (as actually) the best for you > is maybe to build your own pkgng repostories? > http://wiki.freebsd.org/PkgPrimer#Using_poudriere for example? So, to make it really clear, one should *not* test, try or use pkgng if he wants to continue using ports without setting up a repository ? I did not find a big warning on the wiki. -- Olivier Smedts _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) e-mail: olivier@gid0.org - against HTML email & vCards X www: http://www.gid0.org - against proprietary attachments / \ "Il y a seulement 10 sortes de gens dans le monde : ceux qui comprennent le binaire, et ceux qui ne le comprennent pas."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABzXLYM4RSkhOHRquG-5werAQVyGzJ2PWPL%2BK7m7dAEnCSvM2w>