Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 16 Feb 2014 01:14:45 -0600
From:      Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>
To:        Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: graphics/libjpeg-turbo in place of graphics/jpeg
Message-ID:  <CACdU%2Bf92-K70J7jJyRnCiVOyXb4VzFQmFJV3EsfMNa1zA%2BV2AQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1392118066114-5885024.post@n5.nabble.com>
References:  <1392118066114-5885024.post@n5.nabble.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 5:27 AM, Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl> wrote:
> Currently, I reckon that libjpeg-turbo is a drop in replacement
> for graphics/jpeg. Unfortunately, most ports have a direct
> dependency on graphics/jpeg and will complain if it is missing[1].
>
> Is there any way to achieve that and keep pkng happy?
>
See PR 180159

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/180159

This PR adds a new USES feature for jpeg allowing the appropriate jpeg
port to be selected.

Then all jpeg using ports would need to be modified as stated in the PR.

Could someone commit this PR.

Thanks,



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACdU%2Bf92-K70J7jJyRnCiVOyXb4VzFQmFJV3EsfMNa1zA%2BV2AQ>