Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 17:16:54 -0400 From: Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: mdf@freebsd.org, "Robert N. M. Watson" <rwatson@freebsd.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Include file search path Message-ID: <CACqU3MUPfdmeUsGNfm5EDU42e%2B_yj8wErd70XgFhig6PUZG57g@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTindbee1xAsaiYOtrB8HZ=iiewws_Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <AANLkTi=BiUVnzsGg83wwWPHjnTDR=XukhJ3UK6Bd5hvF@mail.gmail.com> <4D934AF4.9080503@FreeBSD.org> <BB9CDEF6-5B59-47F3-8873-78D71E39BF3E@bsdimp.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1104021925110.67810@fledge.watson.org> <742085CD-7F6F-4879-9FFD-517EC3203D52@bsdimp.com> <F5CE9765-FFF0-439C-9156-51912EEE0C1C@freebsd.org> <5AF348C8-6AB6-490D-A12E-89A51528F58F@bsdimp.com> <BANLkTikec9iYVtLMnJ2ovZvENhrFmt_V-g@mail.gmail.com> <D6743558-51E0-46AE-926C-C692904AA02A@bsdimp.com> <BANLkTin6oG3HFTEw8VqyxS8FKBNDjwwz1A@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTindbee1xAsaiYOtrB8HZ=iiewws_Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:01 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> wrote= : >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >>> >>> On May 22, 2011, at 9:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Warner, >>>> >>>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Apr 2, 2011, at 1:10 PM, Robert N. M. Watson wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2 Apr 2011, at 19:47, Warner Losh wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> (2) Working clang/LLVM cross-compile of FreeBSD. =A0This seems lik= e a basic >>>>>>>> =A0requirement to adopt clang/LLVM, and as far as I'm aware that's= not yet a >>>>>>>> =A0resolved issue? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 0 work has been done here to my knowledge. =A0The world view for cl= ang and our in-tree gcc differ which makes it a challenge. >>>>>> >>>>>> That's disappointing. I seem to recall it's more an issue of our bui= ld integration with clang/LLVM than an underlying issue in clang/LLVM? >>>>> >>>>> Yes. =A0The problem isn't hard, the cross compile paradigm is just a = little different. >>>>> >>>>>>>> We (Cambridge) are currently bringing up FreeBSD on a new soft-cor= e 64-bit MIPS platform. =A0We're already using a non-base gcc for our boot = loader work, and plan to move to using clang/LLVM later in the year. =A0The= base system seems a bit short on detail when it comes to the above, curren= tly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes. =A0I've had to add about a dozen changes so far to get close t= o building with xdev compilers. =A0A similar number are needed to make it e= asy to configure and add systree support, I think. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sounds like great progress -- do you think we'll ship 9.0 in a "just= works" state with regard to this? >>>>> >>>>> I sure hope so. =A0I'd like to have demoable stuff by BSDcan. >>>>> >>>> BSDCan has passed, has there been any advance made since that discussi= on ? >>> >>> It is "demonstrable" but not ready to commit to the tree. =A0Needs abou= t 4 hours of work that I've had trouble scheduling on it due to work gettin= g busier than I expected. >>> >> any chances to have a look at the patch or should I wait for the final c= ommit ? >> > ping ? > ping ? - Arnaud
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACqU3MUPfdmeUsGNfm5EDU42e%2B_yj8wErd70XgFhig6PUZG57g>