Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:44:37 +0100 From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Matthias Andree <mandree@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports-system priorities rant (Re: sysutils/cfs) Message-ID: <CADLo83-ZcVAeyznw5DtEHV1tOsBUrZLLR2HJxFjrX_QewpHysA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201109122119.p8CLIEjZ095398@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <4E6A3986.6030505@FreeBSD.org> <201109122119.p8CLIEjZ095398@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 September 2011 22:18, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote: > Matthias Andree wrote: >> >> An obscure piece of software is undesirable (and shouldn't be ported = in >> >> the first place). >> > >> > Bullshit! >> >> I think that suffices. =A0If the discussion is getting emotional, we >> should stop it. > > No. You should stop advocating killing ports, or leave, or be revoked. > FreeBSD would be better without immature ports slaughterers. > Julian, Your arguments have become excessively ad-hominem, and please don't think you're upsetting anyone in the slightest with them. Use rational and technical arguments, or take a break. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-ZcVAeyznw5DtEHV1tOsBUrZLLR2HJxFjrX_QewpHysA>