Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:11:40 +0000 From: Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> To: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: tripwire/and or packages PH will hate, and ask for -exp Message-ID: <CADLo83-zfCUJBsKf8VYseDAvAHX39p=EM57603%2B21buV8VSAuw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F2022F9.7010605@freebsd.org> References: <4F2022F9.7010605@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Jan 2012 15:43, "Michael Scheidell" <scheidell@freebsd.org> wrote: > > when you install tripwire (/usr/ports/security/tripwire), at some point in the install, it asks you, 'interactively' to 'accept' the GPL2 license. > (yes, I know, I could probably use USE_LICENSE=GPL2, and patch install scripts). > > but, then it wants to generate a site key and site pass key. > > none of which PH will like (TB doesn't like it, PH will hate it) > > But, I am not the maintainer, and just trying to get this updated to latest source version, and by updating source tree, this is no worse that it was yesterday. (and I have some portlint's that I fixed) > > > Now: I have MANUALLY verified pkg-plist adds/subtracts, and CAN get package to build if I set NO_DB_BUILD, and manually accept license, and generate keys (so it WILL build, and deinstall, just fine) > > so, how do I keep pav from sending me an email in two days telling me PH won't compile this? > > is this enough in the Makefile to do that? > > NO_PACKAGE= requires manual acceptance of license agreement > IS_INTERACTIVE= yes > PH won't touch those ports, therefore no packages and no Pavmail. Port test to check for leftover files will help. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-zfCUJBsKf8VYseDAvAHX39p=EM57603%2B21buV8VSAuw>