Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 17:51:00 +0100 From: Ottavio Caruso <ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: freebsd should be rewritten based on microkernel architecture Message-ID: <CAEJNuHwewpssL-t49D9pLYWNqYqwAzx4bE2eQdtow05=E9UY5Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGBxaXmvde89R%2BREcup9PEV6SAzQAitwHn9og92uz51GYpu%2B%2BQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <3f1496d1f598c84b3871b630f161256e152aca75.camel@tom.com> <CAGBxaXmvde89R%2BREcup9PEV6SAzQAitwHn9og92uz51GYpu%2B%2BQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 17 Apr 2020 at 12:02, Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> wrote: > > Before getting into detail in the inline comments it is important to note > there is small but very important philosophical difference in the design of > FreeBSD and Linux. FreeBSD follows the core concept of the Hippocratic > Oath: "Do no harm" (aka "if it is not broken don't fix it!") and Linsucks > follows the completely idiotic Facebook mantra of: "Iterate fast and break > things" (aka Only an idiot would use it in a life critical application.) Prepubescent fanboi language that doesn't add much to a technical topic. Translated back into more coherent English, I pretty much like the 1990's "release often, release early" philosophy, which FreeBSD seems to have adopted with its recent policy of offering more frequent releases. -- Ottavio Caruso
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAEJNuHwewpssL-t49D9pLYWNqYqwAzx4bE2eQdtow05=E9UY5Q>