Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 23:36:11 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-fs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, Alexander Best <arundel@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Default inode number too low in FFS nowadays? Message-ID: <CAF-QHFVJa=WvNFEFtk5GYQ3T86FDkpnOC%2BiaK8R%2B3CwFJvrgYQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4EB7126C.3030809@FreeBSD.org> References: <B888842A-7DB4-491B-93E3-A376745019F5@sarenet.es> <j8u2af$chv$1@dough.gmane.org> <5C156A63-D86D-4C1B-AFC4-DC5EA09494F6@xerq.net> <4EB3C63F.2060805@quip.cz> <20111104141626.GA28925@freebsd.org> <4EB7126C.3030809@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 November 2011 00:04, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> This comes up periodically, and for some reason no one pays attention to
> all the work that's been done in the past to verify that the fastest
> method is:
>
> find /usr/ports -maxdepth 3 -type d -name -work -exec rm -rf {} \;
So... time to add it to fortune/datfiles/freebsd-tips ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF-QHFVJa=WvNFEFtk5GYQ3T86FDkpnOC%2BiaK8R%2B3CwFJvrgYQ>