Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 10:04:24 +0000 From: Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> To: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> Cc: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: And Here I Thought buildworld/makeworld Was IO Bound Message-ID: <CAFHbX1%2BYsSuDS%2BUVKBtRTFR0XXmzpRzDi9b7O5wP2zwwc61mbw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <52F96B27.4090509@tundraware.com> References: <52F84AF8.8050007@tundraware.com> <CAFHbX1JcWpW1UOuLFj0PkSBGBsmbKfot1FN8QreHYD-M84E=4Q@mail.gmail.com> <52F96B27.4090509@tundraware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> wrote: > On 02/10/2014 09:55 AM, Tom Evans wrote: >> >> Does poudriere buildworld on tmpfs if you have USE_TMPFS=all? That >> might give you an absolute baseline. > > > I'm not exactly sure what you're suggesting here. I think of > poudriere as a way to build ports trees rapidly. Can it > also be used to compile arbitrary (non ports) programs? Poudriere starts by installing a base jail on which it compiles packages. If you ask it nicely, it will do so by checking out/updating a tree from SVN and compiling it. I was wondering if you had set USE_TMPFS=all, whether it would do that build on tmpfs. Cheers Tom
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFHbX1%2BYsSuDS%2BUVKBtRTFR0XXmzpRzDi9b7O5wP2zwwc61mbw>