Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 13 Oct 2012 12:24:21 -0700
From:      Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>
To:        Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
Cc:        "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@freebsd.org>, net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ixgbe & if_igb RX ring locking
Message-ID:  <CAFOYbc=N87_OECto7B8jdzmRZA-yoa_JWgvVc8kwpK9umO97rQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121013182223.GA73341@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
References:  <5079A9A1.4070403@FreeBSD.org> <20121013182223.GA73341@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:49:21PM +0400, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote:
> > Hello list!
> >
> >
> > Packets receiving code for both ixgbe and if_igb looks like the
> following:
> >
> >
> > ixgbe_msix_que
> >
> > -- ixgbe_rxeof()
> >    {
> >       IXGBE_RX_LOCK(rxr);
> >         while
> >         {
> >            get_packet;
> >
> >            -- ixgbe_rx_input()
> >               {
> >                  ++ IXGBE_RX_UNLOCK(rxr);
> >                  if_input(packet);
> >                  ++ IXGBE_RX_LOCK(rxr);
> >               }
> >
> >         }
> >       IXGBE_RX_UNLOCK(rxr);
> >     }
> >
> > Lines marked with ++ appeared in r209068(igb) and r217593(ixgbe).
> >
> > These lines probably do LORs masking (if any) well.
> > However, such change introduce quite significant performance drop:
> >
> > On my routing setup (nearly the same from previous -Intel 10G thread in
> > -net) adding lock/unlock causes 2.8MPPS decrease to 2.3MPPS which is
> > nearly 20%.
>
> one option could be (same as it is done in the timer
> routine in dummynet) to build a list of all the packets
> that need to be sent to if_input(), and then call
> if_input with the entire list outside the lock.
>
> It would be even easier if we modify the various *_input()
> routines to handle a list of mbufs instead of just one.
>
> cheers
> luigi
>
> Very interesting idea Luigi, will have to get that some thought.

Jack

> So my questions are:
> >
> > Can any real LORs happen in some complex setup? (I can't imagine any).
> > If so: maybe we can somehow avoid/workaround such cases? (and consider
> > removing those locks).
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR, Alexander
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFOYbc=N87_OECto7B8jdzmRZA-yoa_JWgvVc8kwpK9umO97rQ>