Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 21:29:06 -0400 From: Julio Merino <jmmv@freebsd.org> To: Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-testing@freebsd.org" <freebsd-testing@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Location of test kernel drivers in tree? Message-ID: <CAFY7cWAhieTAxjwE=mEq9pn9BAsjTwqfPTgh5fPDSAVK0U9TGw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAGHfRMCWJXi82AQA_vgWUkjWGXc86subB_0u18R9MgAnXfo_pQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGHfRMC==6WRKwd13R7Yyjyu%2B_Oi_173TLTXPVk9ynH0G5qqxg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFY7cWCR_bUjm4KSLow85%2BeshTgDVzPCF5iJVS0rb37Lh7zGWQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGHfRMCWJXi82AQA_vgWUkjWGXc86subB_0u18R9MgAnXfo_pQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was thinking of sys/tests (with associated build machinery under > sys/modules/tests) because the kernel and world [*] build vary wildly > by design. But didn't we decide a while ago that we'd put kernel tests in tests/sys/ precisely to avoid the build system "oddities" of the kernel? That's where the few kernel-level tests that we have today live... Or am I misunderstanding? Because if you originally said that you'd put _only_ the test-related kernel modules in sys/..., then I guess that makes sense!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFY7cWAhieTAxjwE=mEq9pn9BAsjTwqfPTgh5fPDSAVK0U9TGw>