Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:27:50 -0600 From: PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, =?windows-1251?B?y/7h7uzo8CDD8Ojj7vDu4g==?= <nm.knife@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel 6250 and WiMax Message-ID: <CAFZ_MYL8wTFp5b%2BxvovaA5wy-RnengWYOWfx8EsC5xm3sDx%2BBQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1016606749.20120410102710@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <CAFZ_MYLe4AjtMwgzBq22sBYhHkQimfybB%2Ban1xX2JnMiP%2BY6rg@mail.gmail.com> <4F839730.2020503@gmail.com> <1016606749.20120410102710@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 14:06:51 -0700 > From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> > Subject: Re: Intel 6250 and WiMax > To: ??????? ???????? <nm.knife@gmail.com> > Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<CAJ-Vmonjuu3-ikc+_5EuBTZLK+beW1eC50T-5N2_GagB= S_NbXg@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dwindows-1251 > > 2012/4/9 =EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=C3=B0 =EF= =BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=EF=BF=BD=C3=A2 <nm.knif= e@gmail.com>: >>> We do. Linux has a stack in net/wimax and the driver for the >>> Intel devices is in drivers/net/wimax/i2400m >>> In other words, no, we currently do not support the WiMax stuff >>> of any of the Intel cards nor any other device afaik >> >> Hmm, I suppose I can always order the carry-it-anywhere hub as a solutio= n. >> Or use Windows / GNU/Linux. Since it seems this isn't something short an= d >> easy, and given the status of WiMax, probably not something that will >> happen for FreeBSD soon/ever. > > I really am encouraging someone to look into this. I'd love to see > wimax stack+support in FreeBSD. At a quick look, linux wimax stack doesn't do much. Basically, it handles attach/detach and some state changes (INIT and RUN). I could work on adding this degree of supports as a weekend project (slow progress) if no one does it. Though, only usie and uhso could get benefits, i.e. call if_alloc() with other than IFT_OTHER, no manual configuration, and relevant ifconfig out put, like carrier: mega telco media: GSM status: connected bar: . : i | How should we name it, net80216 netwimax netwman netmnet (mobile net) netwnet (wireless net) or else? For those looking for device drivers, even though wimax stack is added, someone still have to write the drivers to make your device work. > > If you can come up with a useful sounding proposal, the freebsd > foundation may even sponsor the work. Then, will the foundation send me one like this? http://forums.freebsd.org/showpost.php?p=3D84303&postcount=3D29 AK
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAFZ_MYL8wTFp5b%2BxvovaA5wy-RnengWYOWfx8EsC5xm3sDx%2BBQ>