Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:08:49 -0600 From: "Uni T. Runker" <unitrunker@gmail.com> To: freebsd-git@freebsd.org Subject: Re: got(1) in base (was: Re: gitup(1) in base) Message-ID: <CAGV7fbwQn=ebt5RxakSvU3vit96L3Tc2sUCmtiSp1kJ3-5EERg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <YCOZM4UZq17kCJ9b@byrne.stsp.name> References: <49046db6-88d9-d59d-85f5-ecc1321b07c6@siemens.com> <slrns25vip.162.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de> <YCOZM4UZq17kCJ9b@byrne.stsp.name>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 2:28 AM Stefan Sperling <stsp@stsp.name> wrote: > There is now a got-portable.git repository which currently targets Linux. > This repository is maintained by Thomas Adam. > Perhaps full FreeBSD + capsicum support could be integrated there first, > and the result integrated into FreeBSD base? > Please talk to Thomas if this sounds like a good plan. > I looked at got in late 2019 - it had the following OpenBSD dependencies: 1. pledge, unveil, recallocarray. 2. imsg (which thankfully already exists in ports as part of libopenbsd). 3. endian.h 4. util.h 5. SIMPLEQ_XXXX Using the portable version as a base for FreeBSD makes sense to me. However, Christian did a lot of work to make got run on FreeBSD. Christian - what's your opinion on this?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGV7fbwQn=ebt5RxakSvU3vit96L3Tc2sUCmtiSp1kJ3-5EERg>