Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 10:59:28 -0400 From: Cheng Cui <cc@freebsd.org> To: void <void@f-m.fm> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14 Message-ID: <CAGaXui%2BQ7wCM1dAKis%2BvNaNJ5uODeiC765hoXWT4OBtT7npprw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <ZxaccxFblDt0UQWR@int21h> References: <Zw3dlDuaSXsIG-yX@vm2> <CAGaXuiLG4Qv2KgDtJveN3adLh6b8tEzC4j6OYfLo1_dj8BKZWQ@mail.gmail.com> <Zw_6SNSEW5mXMy_I@vm2> <CAGaXuiL_Fk=_FtU23RoJBP0WguU8_-y3Tb1iZ=T2unVv-2aRpA@mail.gmail.com> <ZxDdnSngi13UyZSL@vm2> <CAGaXuiK52ufOs-eVfKHAYpGxRyGfCMpbbZy4GcShybTzHcjDGg@mail.gmail.com> <ZxEqfISBJIW75p_P@vm2> <CAGaXuiJW5QW1eFqjXtSO%2BojOX5G12B56%2BnzE9zaVR7nB33VjWA@mail.gmail.com> <ZxJe8e8sRU9NCHv4@vm2> <CAGaXuiKD-b4PGrqfxy9zk-BRxU==HMc9KshqyJGzH8saeOLf1A@mail.gmail.com> <ZxaccxFblDt0UQWR@int21h>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 2:25 PM void <void@f-m.fm> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 10:42:49AM -0400, Cheng Cui wrote: > >Change the subject to `Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14`, was `Re: > >Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge`. > > > >I actually prepared two patches, one depends on the other: > > > >https://reviews.freebsd.org/D47218 << apply this patch firstly > >https://reviews.freebsd.org/D47213 << apply this patch secondly > > > >Please let me know if you have any questions. > > Hi, > > What version (git -C /usr/src rev-list --count --first-parent HEAD) did you > patch? > It was based on the latest stable/14 branch @commit 025535f94525. Or your command returns this: # git -C /usr/src rev-list --count --first-parent HEAD 269221 > I installed > FreeBSD-14.1-STABLE-amd64-20241017-d36ba3989ca9-269125-disc1.iso and > then updated the sources with git before checking out stable/14 which is > n269252, applying the patches and building/installing kernel from there. > > What's the exact iperf command you're using please? I'm using > > # iperf --time 60 -c 192.168.1.232 > > This is ok. I used iperf3. but I'm not sure [see note a] if that one would give comparable tests to > yours. > > Please re-organize your test result in before/after patch order. So that I can understand and compare them. -- Best Regards, Cheng Cui [-- Attachment #2 --] <div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 2:25 PM void <<a href="mailto:void@f-m.fm">void@f-m.fm</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 10:42:49AM -0400, Cheng Cui wrote:<br> >Change the subject to `Performance test for CUBIC in stable/14`, was `Re:<br> >Performance issues with vnet jails + epair + bridge`.<br> ><br> >I actually prepared two patches, one depends on the other:<br> ><br> ><a href="https://reviews.freebsd.org/D47218" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://reviews.freebsd.org/D47218</a>   << apply this patch firstly<br> ><a href="https://reviews.freebsd.org/D47213" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://reviews.freebsd.org/D47213</a>   << apply this patch secondly<br> ><br> >Please let me know if you have any questions.<br> <br> Hi,<br> <br> What version (git -C /usr/src rev-list --count --first-parent HEAD) did you<br> patch? <br></blockquote>It was based on the latest stable/14 branch @commit 025535f94525.</div><div class="gmail_quote">Or your command returns this:</div><div class="gmail_quote"># git -C /usr/src rev-list --count --first-parent HEAD<br>269221<br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> <br> I installed FreeBSD-14.1-STABLE-amd64-20241017-d36ba3989ca9-269125-disc1.iso and<br> then updated the sources with git before checking out stable/14 which is<br> n269252, applying the patches and building/installing kernel from there.<br> <br> What's the exact iperf command you're using please? I'm using<br> <br> # iperf --time 60 -c 192.168.1.232<br> <br></blockquote><div>This is ok. I used iperf3.</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"> but I'm not sure [see note a] if that one would give comparable tests to yours.<br> <br></blockquote><div>Please re-organize your test result in before/after patch order. So that I can understand</div><div>and compare them.</div><div> </div><div>--<br></div></div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div></div>Best Regards,<div>Cheng Cui</div></div></div></div>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGaXui%2BQ7wCM1dAKis%2BvNaNJ5uODeiC765hoXWT4OBtT7npprw>