Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 09:17:02 +0800 From: Xiaofan Chen <xiaofanc@gmail.com> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: "Wojciech A. Koszek" <wkoszek@freebsd.org>, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb/173666: [USB, LIBUSB] usb_reset() behavior different between GNU/Linux and FreeBSD Message-ID: <CAGjSPUA3WpKiifGA_Cu1aeV%2BnEPFxQdXpo69T5T73SWxnVXiPw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201212231040.25892.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <201211162247.qAGMlTm2057387@red.freebsd.org> <201212210838.32260.hselasky@c2i.net> <CAGjSPUCuDUTMTn427v=GWdLqm3LcSM7OR1nFpVoyXgba%2BtX3dQ@mail.gmail.com> <201212231040.25892.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> wrote: > On Saturday 22 December 2012 11:17:15 Xiaofan Chen wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> > wrote: >> > If you look in the old libusb-0.1 code you'll see something different I >> > think. Could you check that? >> >> Not much differences in reality. I believe it is a document bug for the >> libusb-0.1. >> >> Both old libusb-0.1 code and libusb-1.0 use the same IOCTL under Linux >> and the behavior should be similar. >> >> Please refer to the following code listing and take note even though >> the name of the IOCTL is different but they are the same if you >> look at the defines. > > Can you create a thread for this at the libusb lists? Okay. -- Xiaofan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGjSPUA3WpKiifGA_Cu1aeV%2BnEPFxQdXpo69T5T73SWxnVXiPw>