Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:47:18 -0700 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@freebsd.org> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Future of ident(1) Message-ID: <CAH7qZfstVoZiqTt=OvmC762zZZ7Lr6XOu8Nvn0Sxt9_T2yM8Kw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20211022212947.GA59184@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20211022212947.GA59184@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--000000000000d39ea705cf301df7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Just in case someone thinks this is something useful, I've got a PR filed against git to implement custom $Id$. There are no technical issues with the change but Git developers are not very keen on merging it in, since they see this as an obscure feature, no one needs. :-/ So if anyone wants to chime in on GitHub or git mailing list please do so. https://github.com/git/git/pull/1074 Thanks! -Max On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 2:30 PM Steve Kargl < sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > All, > > With the new world order, what is the future of ident(1)? > Should it be removed from base? Given a compiled binary > in base, how does one find the equivalent git info that > ident(1) used to perform? > > Having a few minutes to dust off old patchs for libm, should > I remove $FreeBSD$ tags in files I touch? For new files, is > it expected that useless $FreeBSD$ tags should be added? > > -- > Steve > > --000000000000d39ea705cf301df7--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAH7qZfstVoZiqTt=OvmC762zZZ7Lr6XOu8Nvn0Sxt9_T2yM8Kw>