Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:10:37 +0200 From: Olivier Duchateau <duchateau.olivier@gmail.com> To: Florent Peterschmitt <fpeterscom@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x11/Terminal - why not xfce4-terminal Message-ID: <CAHcdu2oMW-OYZ_K6VC0HXafa2vZbap_6_5ERpv9umSL-VF8c2Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5063118C.9080404@gmail.com> References: <50630E95.1060400@gmail.com> <20120926152651.3ea916ce@laptop> <5063118C.9080404@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2012/9/26 Florent Peterschmitt <fpeterscom@gmail.com>: > Le 26/09/2012 12:26, Sergey V. Dyatko a =E9crit : > >> On Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:17:57 +0000 >> Florent Peterschmitt<fpeterscom@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Why the terminal emulator from XFCE4 is called Terminal instead of >>> xfce4-terminal ? >> >> http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/terminal >> >> >> > Ok, then next question. Why xfce apps are not under un sub-directory call= ed > xfce (or xfce4 if versionning becomes important) ? > What do you mean by =AB Why xfce apps are not under un sub-directory called xfce =BB ? --=20 olivier
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHcdu2oMW-OYZ_K6VC0HXafa2vZbap_6_5ERpv9umSL-VF8c2Q>